Explore answers, insights and our mission to serve communities in need.
Implementing innovations
A good idea is the starting point – not the end goal. There is often a long, challenging journey between a promising innovation and its successful implementation, one that causes many organisations to fail. Not because the idea was bad, but because the implementation was underestimated. Innovations need more than enthusiasm – they need structure, patience and the willingness to persevere even when things become more difficult than expected. Particularly in humanitarian work, where innovations can have a direct impact on people’s lives, the quality of implementation carries a special responsibility. Anyone introducing new approaches must ensure that they actually work – and do not just sound convincing on paper.
Why innovation is so important in humanitarian work
The challenges facing aid organisations are changing – sometimes rapidly, sometimes gradually. Climate change is altering disaster patterns, demographic change is reshaping population structures, and new technologies are opening up possibilities that were unthinkable just a few years ago. Organisations that fail to respond to these changes and rigidly cling to old approaches risk losing their relevance – and, worse still, their effectiveness.
In this context, innovation does not necessarily mean technological progress. It can also be a new way of working with communities, a different approach to project management, or a different form of communication with supporters. What matters is not whether an innovation is spectacular, but whether it improves the lives of the people for whom it is intended. Sustainability in social projects often arises precisely where innovations are not introduced as an end in themselves, but are consistently assessed in terms of their actual benefits.
From idea to implementation
The journey from an innovative idea to its implementation in practice can be divided into several phases, each of which has its own specific requirements.
Evaluating and selecting ideas
Not every idea deserves to be put into practice. Before resources are invested in an innovation, a sober assessment is needed: Does this idea solve a real problem? Is it feasible in the given context? What risks are involved, and do the potential benefits outweigh them? These questions may seem obvious – but in practice they are often overlooked because enthusiasm for a new idea clouds one’s critical judgement.
A structured assessment should take various perspectives into account. What do the people who face the problem on a daily basis have to say? What do local partners who are familiar with the context have to say? And what do past experiences with similar approaches tell us? An idea that stands up to scrutiny from these different angles has a much better chance of being successfully implemented than one that has simply been developed behind closed doors.
Pilot phases and phased roll-out
One of the most common mistakes made when introducing innovations is rolling them out in full without first testing them. Anyone who implements a new idea on a large scale straight away is taking a high risk – because even well-thought-out approaches sometimes fail in practice due to factors that were not apparent beforehand.
A phased roll-out is preferable: starting with a limited pilot scheme that allows experience to be gained, weaknesses to be identified and adjustments to be made before the innovation is rolled out on a larger scale. A pilot project is not a sign of hesitation – it is a sign of a sense of responsibility. It protects the target group from the negative effects of a failed experiment and the organisation from the loss of resources and trust.
A good pilot phase should include the following elements:
- A clear definition of success criteria, used to assess whether the pilot scheme was successful
- Systematic data collection during the pilot phase in order to draw well-founded conclusions
- Regular feedback sessions with all those involved – the team, partner organisations and beneficiaries
- A clearly defined decision point at which a decision is made as to whether the innovation should be scaled up, adapted or discontinued
Recognising and overcoming resistance
Innovations almost always meet with resistance – this is normal and does not mean that the idea is a bad one. People tend to favour tried-and-tested methods because familiarity provides a sense of security. Anyone introducing innovations must take this resistance seriously and actively address it.
The following approaches can help with this:
- Involving all stakeholders in the development process at an early stage, so that innovations are not perceived as being imposed from outside, but as having been developed jointly
- Open communication about the objectives, reasons and expected benefits of the innovation – people find it easier to accept change when they understand why it is necessary
- Communicate small, visible successes at an early stage to dispel scepticism and build trust in the new approach
Innovation as an ongoing process
Implementing innovations is not a one-off task that is ever truly complete. Anyone who innovates today must be prepared tomorrow to re-examine their own innovation – because contexts change, because new insights emerge and because better solutions can be found. Organisations that view innovation as an ongoing process rather than a one-off project remain capable of learning, adaptable and effective in the long term. And that is precisely what distinguishes effective work from well-intentioned but ineffective efforts.