Explore answers, insights and our mission to serve communities in need.
Promoting participation
People who are allowed to help shape things take on more responsibility. This is not just a theory – it is an experience that is repeatedly confirmed in humanitarian work. Projects in which those affected are involved from the outset achieve better results, are more sustainable and are more widely accepted within the community than those planned and implemented without genuine participation. Promoting participation therefore does not mean slowing down processes or watering down decisions. It means drawing on the wisdom, knowledge and energy of the people who know best what they need – and who stand to gain the most when projects are truly successful.
Why participation is more than just a method
In development cooperation, participation is sometimes treated as a tool to be used when it suits – and set aside when it becomes too much of a hassle. This fails to recognise the very essence of participation. It is not primarily a technique, but an attitude: the conviction that people have the right to have a say in decisions that affect their lives.
This approach has practical implications. Anyone who takes participation seriously sets aside more time for consultations. They accept that this makes processes more complex. They are prepared to adjust plans if feedback suggests this is necessary. And they communicate transparently about what happens to the feedback received from those involved – even when not everything can be implemented.
For organisations that rely on donations and are accountable to their supporters, participation takes on an additional dimension. Projects developed in collaboration with those affected are easier to justify – because they are based on genuine needs rather than on assumptions imposed on a community from outside.
Forms of participation in project work
Participation is not a one-size-fits-all concept. It can take place at various levels and be organised with varying degrees of intensity – depending on the context, the project phase and the capacities of all those involved.
Information and consultation as a basis
The simplest form of participation is providing information: people are told what is planned, why, and how it is to be implemented. This may sound obvious, but in practice it is often neglected. If communities only find out about a project once it is already underway, mistrust arises – even if the measures are well-intentioned and sensible.
The next step is consultation: people are not merely informed, but actively asked for their views. What do they think of the proposed approach? What concerns do they have? What would they do differently? Taking these questions seriously does not mean acting on every objection – but it does mean carefully considering the feedback and communicating transparently which suggestions have been incorporated into the planning and which have not, and why.
Consultations should be designed in such a way that a genuine range of voices is heard. Open community meetings often give a platform to the loudest and most influential voices. Smaller group settings, one-to-one discussions or anonymous surveys can help to reach more reserved or marginalised members of the community – who often include women, older people or particularly vulnerable groups such as children in need.
Genuine participation in decision-making and personal responsibility
The strongest form of participation goes beyond information and consultation: people make their own decisions on matters that affect them. This may mean that local committees decide how project funds are to be used, that community members select project staff, or that the community itself determines which measures should be implemented as a priority.
This form of participation requires the greatest trust – and, in return, fosters the strongest sense of identification. Those who have made their own decisions feel responsible for the outcome. And those who bear responsibility work with greater commitment to ensure that the outcome is a success. This effect is well documented in practice and should be a key argument in favour of enabling genuine co-decision-making – even if it involves more effort initially.
The following measures help to promote participatory decision-making in a structured way:
- Establishment of local steering committees with clearly defined decision-making powers and transparent processes
- Training courses for community members to enable them to make informed decisions and evaluate results
- Regular reporting by project leaders to the community on progress and the use of funds
- Clear escalation procedures in the event that the decisions of the community and the organisation diverge
Embedding participation in the long term
Participation that takes place only during a project and ends once it is over leaves little lasting impact. Anyone who really wants to make a difference thinks from the outset about how the structures that enable participation can continue to exist even after the project has ended. This means building local capacity, transferring knowledge and creating structures that function independently of external support.
Communities that have learnt to organise themselves, make decisions and steer their own development processes are more resilient – in the face of crises, change and the temptation to accept external aid as a permanent state of affairs. In this sense, promoting participation is the most direct route to what all good humanitarian work ultimately strives for: communities that can take control of their own destiny – with dignity, competence and confidence in their own strength.